Anyway, the real truth is that I also was reading a post published on CR Magazine blog regarding the Constructivism Movement and its influence in the visual, in special, Graphic Design. The article is actually debating the endurance of the influence of such visual language along the years up to to present; questioning its appeal as a visual language in itself, detached from the political views associated to its origins.

Rodchenko photomontage,1924. She says: 'Books'

Franz Ferdinand album 'You Can Have It So Much Better'
As a former graphic design student it is very easy to understand the reasons why the movement is so intrinsic to the practice: on studying design, you train yourself to see everything around you in geometric shapes, 'deconstructing' everything to their basic forms. And those basic shapes are in the end the skeleton of a traditional graphic piece - grids, rules, shaped backgrounds. Any hue, images and typography — the organs and skin — tend to turn into chaos without the underneath structure. Obviously there are the practitioners of the antithesis of the movement, aka David Carson.
The question is: Do the images posted above (originally posted on the CR post) illustrate the influence of the movement on current graphic pieces or do they illustrate one of the greatest debates in the creative world: plagiarism. It is quite clear that the second designer 'inspired' his work on the first one. However I guess the album cover does not mean to bring the same political appeal of the Russian poster. Given the title of the album, can we take as an excuse the use of a certain irony? And if so, at what point is this irony clever?
And then I started questioning myself: all my posts are triggered by things I see and read around. I am scanning and browsing things all the time and my brain goes around working as a sponge. At certain point it starts making connections among all these things and there I go, a post. Am I being unethical at some point?
References:
http://www.answers.com/topic/constructivism
http://www.creativereview.co.uk/cr-blog/2008/august/constructivism-the-ism-that-just-keeps-givin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructivism_(art)
http://www.answers.com/topic/constructivism
http://www.creativereview.co.uk/cr-blog/2008/august/constructivism-the-ism-that-just-keeps-givin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructivism_(art)














